by Mentat1231
rattkin wrote:
You still haven't brought any specific example of material in which reviewers are saying what you are saying "they" are saying. Without that, you're kind of fighting with imaginary adversary you've created to ... I'm not sure what for, actually. Was this a quest to prove that someone who calls himself a reviewer does not know what he/she is talking about? Or some kind of jaded response in general, that the world doesn't appreciate the game the same way you do?
I'm genuinely curious. I've watched Dice Tower review of Tokaido and Tokaido: Crossroads. None of your points were mentioned in both videos. As for Rahdo, I think he never reviewed Tokaido, actually.
I'm genuinely curious. I've watched Dice Tower review of Tokaido and Tokaido: Crossroads. None of your points were mentioned in both videos. As for Rahdo, I think he never reviewed Tokaido, actually.
I don't see how I could be clearer: I gave representative statements of what people have said, and showed why those are mistaken. Others chimed in, as I expected they would, and said they also disagree with similar criticisms (rilos even quoted a recent YouTube review). I gave the specific example of Ryan on the Deep End, with whom I normally agree, and Zee has mentioned on more than one occasion that he thinks Crossroads doubles the complexity and difficulty of teaching. It's a general point. I wasn't frustrated because I keep clips from every podcast and memorize them; it was a general impression and some of the criticisms I'd heard. So I gave rebuttals. Is that alright?